Next Hearing In Gyanvapi Case By Varanasi District Court On May 26
Varanasi, May 24 (TNA) Now hearing in Gyanvapi case will be held again on May 26. After hearing both the sides, the court gave a new date while conducting a hearing on the petition of Muslim side in Gyanvapi case,
On the survey, the court has sought objection from both the parties in a week. The judge gave a new date after hearing both the sides. The lawyer for the plaintiff said that their demand was fulfilled. Videography copy will be given to both the parties.
Earlier, the hearing of the Supreme Court's order in the Gyanvapi campus dispute was held in Varanasi's district judge's court on Monday. Both the sides put forth their demands but the court, while not giving any decision, adjourned the hearing till Tuesday.
Earlier, there was a ban on the entry of anyone other than the plaintiff-defendant's parties and their advocates in the court room due to which only 23 people went to court.
Primarily the district judge's court will decide whether to first hear the suit for the maintainability of the petition or to hear the objections raised in the Shringar Gauri case first. On Monday, both sides kept their points in the court of District Judge Dr. Ajay Krishna Vishwes for about 45 minutes.
Anjuman Intejamiya said that first in compliance with the order of the Supreme Court, it should be decided whether the case of Rakhi Singh Vs State of UP is maintainable or not. It said that after the filing of the suit, the maintainability was challenged, but the lower court, ignoring it, ordered the survey commission.
Now the first decision has to be taken whether the Special Places of Worship Act 1991 is applicable or not. Advocate Vishnu Jain, appearing for the plaintiff, said that the videos and photos of the commission proceedings are evidence related to this case. First their copy should be given, then after objection from both the sides, it should be decided whether the suit is maintainable or not.
He said that the Special Place of Worship Act does not apply here. DGC Civil Mahendra Prasad Pandey also said that worship is being done before and after 1991 also. In this case, the Special Place of Worship Act does not apply.